2nd, in reality about inhabitants out of college students (Spain, an individual university) the presence of non-heterosexuality try broadening
Response: Many thanks really for your conditions. In the last type of the newest manuscript, and in response to one of many writers, i attempted to determine that it increase in the latest prevalence away from participants from intimate minorities, therefore we revealed that our very own analysis incorporated sexual positioning since covariate:
Basic, our very own surveys are not only biased by intimate positioning (highest odds of involvement to possess non-heterosexual anyone), but also you to definitely bias 
It incidence out-of sexual minorities is higher than you to definitely found in comparable studies far away, one another Eu (particularly, Sumter & Vandenbosch (2019), about Netherlands, had a keen 83.5% from heterosexuals and you may 16.5% of low-heterosexuals) as in the usa (eg, Alexopoulos mais aussi al. (2020), found 80.5% regarding heterosexuals and you can 19.5% off non-heterosexuals). Nonetheless, so it incidence is quite like look far away, along these lines by Tsoukas and ong Australians aged 18 in order to 69 (71% heterosexuals, 29% non-heterosexuals).
Basic, the fresh new high ratio of participants out-of intimate minorities, more than 31% of one’s last shot
Besides that, one of the current education wrote with this question is that of Rahman et al. (2020), who analyzed the frequency out of women’s and you will men’s room sexual orientation inside the twenty eight countries using investigation off 191,088 players. These experts found that, regarding sexual destination (one of de- areas of sexual positioning), 82.6% of males and you will 66.2% of females had been mainly not attracted to a similar intercourse, when you are 17.4% of males and you may 33.8% of women was indeed moderately otherwise mainly keen on a comparable sex. Considering study from the country, having investigation grouped together for men and girls, it may be viewed the ratio to have Spain is actually 73% against. 27%, similar to that of this research and very similar to you to of different countries, such as Australian continent (74%-26%), Finland (71%-29%), Netherlands (70%-30%), or You (73%-27%). For this reason, seemingly regarding intimate destination, the data off their regions are similar to ours. As for the pattern, apparently nowadays and particularly for the nations which have a whole lot more knowledgeable guidelines on sexual minorities, eg Spain, you will find a boost in the fresh new frequency of individuals who claim so you can get into her or him, something parallel for the loss of stigma and you will an improvement on the quality of life of these someone (Pachankis ainsi que al., 2016).
Delivering all these into account, i have changed the newest Dialogue area, temporarily mentioning that the overall performance gotten plus the trend within the our very own analysis can be just like what is actually found in other places (today, during the p. 16-17, outlines 334-361):
In any case, within our regression analyses i provided intimate orientation while the covariate
Towards so you’re able to intimate direction, one or two issues shall be noted. This is often considered as deficiencies in representativeness of your shot. We think you to definitely an option interpretation is possible. This research offers with earlier training the same sampling means and you may population (Spanish university students with similar age range and you will regarding the same college or university). We are going to reveal committed of information collection as well as the ratio away from intimate fraction users: , fourteen.7% , , 8.6% . A very clear trend is located. The newest ratio of sexual fraction people was continuously growing inside our products.